figure 1: assumed pupil
|
figure 2: PSF superimposed on MEMS generated slit, logarithmic scale.
|
figure 3: slit throughput as a function of dither position.
|
figure 4: total throughput (= slit + aperture stop, 20% oversizing)
as a function of dither position. With 20% oversizing, diffraction losses are a
significant effect.
|
Figure 5: histogram of throughputs at random position within slit.
The black curve are the computations which takes into account only the geometrical
effect of the PSF on the MEMS generated slit. The red curve is for the same
computation but including the diffraction effects. Note that losses by diffraction
are largest at positions where the slit throughput is already small.
|
Figure 6: possible NGST pupil. (J. Krist)
|
Figure 7: used NGST PSFs plotted with log scale:
a) circular mirror, 15% obscuration (same as figure 2)
b) same as a, but aberration with total rms wavefront error of 0.2mu
c) segmented mirror as shown in figure 6
d) same as c, but aberration with total rms wavefront error of 0.1mu
Figure 8: histogram of throughputs at random position within slit for
the PSF shown in figure 7c.
The black curve are the computations which takes into account only the geometrical
effect of the PSF on the MEMS generated slit. The red curve is for the same
computation but including the diffraction effects.
|
The number of random dither positions needed to obtain a flux accuracy of 10% by averaging the measured fluxes is computed as
| PSF | diffraction loss | n_dither |
| a) | 19.7% | 64 |
| b) | 18.8% | 9 |
| c) | 19.6% | 36 |
| d) | 18.9% | 24 |
Figure 9: Strehl ratios of the PSFs as a function
of wavelength.